The Westin Hotel, Portland, OR
Participants
|
Larry Bellows
Barbara Bigham
Bob Blanks
Myron Brown
Judy Campanale
Bill Decken
Andrew Destro
Marshall Dickholtz
Thom Gelardi
|
Harold (Skip) George
Laurent Goldstein
Veronica Gutierrez
Edward Hacmac
Mike Henricksen
Christopher Kent
Peter Kervorkian
David B Koch
Daniel Kuhn
|
Cheryl Langley
Matthew McCoy
Brian Mikula
Peter Morgan
Carlos Negrete
Don Olson
Yannick Pauli
Dick Plummer
Mike Reid
|
Heather Rice
Terry Rondberg
Liam Schubel
Jon Schwartzbauer
Rob Sinnott
Brian Stenzler
|
Facilitated By Mary Rowe
The meeting opened with general introductions and the laying of "ground rules" for discussions. We all shared with the group our expectations of the meeting.
ACHIEVEMENTS / BENCHMARKS
Upon listing many of the profession's "achievements" it became obvious that many of them couldn't be considered positive advancements of subluxation-centered chiropractic and the list was instead characterized as the profession's "benchmarks." These included events and developments such as:
- Federal recognition of the CCE as an accrediting agency
- Coverage by Medicare
- The Wilk case
- Sherman accreditation
- Closure of two "straight" schools
- The growth of the NCMIC
- Formation of the World Chiropractic Alliance
- Publication of Journal of Vertebral Subluxation Research
- Resurgence of interest in chiropractic philosophy
- Development of the Council on Chiropractic Practice guidelines
- Refinement of subluxation-centered techniques
- Improved public communication and education
- Introduction of chiropractic in other countries
- Formation of Chiropractic Benefit Services
- Increase utilization of chiropractic by public
|
- Increased prestige of chiropractic
- Licensure in all states
- Standardization of licensure
- Introduction of chiropractic into military health plans
- Use of chiropractic in sports
- Recognition of chiropractic as good career choice
- Increased acceptance of chiropractic as primary care provider
- Research to prove impact of vertebral subluxation
- New Zealand college founded
- Representation on government committees, White House commission, etc.
- Formation of SCASA
- Survival of subluxation-based chiropractic
- Formation of Chiropractic Coalition
- Establishment of relationship with WHO
- Fending off PT mandate in CCE standards
- Publication of The Chiropractic Journal
|
CHALLENGES
The group then worked to identify the key challenges facing the profession as a whole and subluxation-centered chiropractic in particular. These challenges included:
- Ignorance about subluxation among the general public
- Clinical "disconnect" between education and practice
- Condition-based quasi-medical emphasis in colleges
- The CCE-NCLB monopoly on defining professional education and licensure
- The perceived incompatibility between science and philosophy
- The adoption of the medical model by some sectors of the profession (and their desire to foist that model on the profession as a whole)
- The medical profession beginning to co-opt chiropractic vitalistic paradigm
- Medicine controls the flow of money to health care
- Non DCs performing "chiropractic" adjustments (with DCs getting the blame if something goes wrong)
- Apathy and non-involvement within the subluxation-centered community
- No way to opt out of Medicare
- Boards are moving into legislative arenas; exceeding authority and discriminating against subluxation-centered chiropractors
- Emphasis now on $$$ -- third party payer addiction; pandering to insurance companies, etc.
- High cost of chiropractic education
- VS not clinically or scientifically meaningful
- Need for a second accrediting agency
- Internal enemies often worse than outside opponents
|
- Federal lawsuits being brought against DCs who see patients more than 10 visits
- NACM (National Association of Chiropractic Medicine)
- ACA is destroying subluxation-centered chiropractic
- DCs who want to be RDs ("Real Doctors") – inferiority complex
- There isn't enough scientific evidence on the VS
- Blurring of the line between spinal manipulative therapy and adjustments (SMT vs LACVS)
- Schools and boards not accountable to profession
- Very survival of subluxation-based chiropractic
- "Reproduction" (making sure future generations of DCs embrace subluxation-centered chiropractic)
- Need to grow and evolve (can't be in defense mode and grow at the same time)
- Need for coordination between subluxation-centered doctors and groups
- Lexicon being surrendered
- Subluxation-centered chiropractic views as irrational by some
- Saddled with the "we cure all diseases" myth
- Profession doesn't hold VS core values
- Egos and technique competition
- Lack of training in actual running of a practice
- Positioning in the wellness industry
- No corporate support
|
These challenges were discussed and then grouped into five major issue areas: Scope; Context (External Environment); Internal Governance and Accountability; Research; and Professional Cohesion. Participants broke off into groups in order to examine each of these issues in more detail, set priorities, identify the "players" involved, and determine what steps might be undertaken to address them. Afterwards, each group gave a summary of its conclusion to the rest of the assembly.
HIGHLIGHT: When the idea of "Philosophy Nights" was suggested as a way to promote subluxation-centered chiropractic, Laurent Goldstein, president of Brican Corp., offered to sponsor such meetings.
TAKING ACTION
By the next morning, Mary Rowe had miraculously managed to synthesize all of this input and develop a draft for the group's statement of purpose as well as a list of the five major tasks facing the group. The draft has evolved into the "Advancing Chiropractic: The Portland Project" paper and is undergoing final editing now.
The five major tasks were:
Communication: Make communication a priority by forming a broadly constituted Task Force charged with increasing awareness and understanding of the role of vertebral subluxation correction within and outside the profession. This will benefit the profession as a whole, reminding members of chiropractic’s roots and clarifying for consumers what makes chiropractic unique and how it differs from allopathic diagnosis and treatment.
Research: Create a vertebral subluxation-centered research culture within the profession. This will involve equipping doctors of chiropractic to collect data on vertebral subluxation correction, supporting the development and application of subluxation-centered guidelines, encouraging practice-based health outcomes research, increasing subscriptions to subluxation-centered peer reviewed journals, and exploring ways to involve all stake holders -- students, practitioners, colleges, researchers -- in this process.
Governance & accountability: Enhance the internal accountability of the profession by creating a network of active subluxation-centered practitioners who can monitor national and local regulatory agency actions, serve on licensing and regulatory boards, take leadership roles in professional organizations, host local leadership development workshops, and participate in inter- and intra-disciplinary forums.
Remove non-chiropractic requirements: Initiate a targeted campaign to remove any adjunctive therapy as a mandatory requirement of chiropractic licensure in order to safeguard the right to practice for those who do not wish to include therapeutic approaches in their scope of practice.
Model practice act: Develop a model chiropractic practice act that strengthens the legal status of subluxation-centered chiropractic, clarifies our scope of practice, and allows for differentiation from chiropractors wishing to obtain optional certification.
To this was added one more undertaking:
Mutual support: Assist vertebral subluxation-centered chiropractors to develop effective practices that meet patient needs, maintain the highest ethical standards and incorporate sound business and financial principles. This can be accomplished through mentoring programs, practice consultation, business training, and the development and provision of information and resources for chiropractors wishing to maintain a subluxation-centered practice.
Each participant chose which issue or issues he or she was most interested in and once more broke off into individual task force groups to choose a coordinator and determine an outcome measurement, plan of action, and a timeline.
TASK FORCES
1) Communication
Members: Drs. Langley, Morgan, Reid, Rondberg, and Steve Simonetti* (leader: Morgan)
* not a participant
2) Research
Members: Drs. Bellows, Blanks, Browning, Campanale, Kent, Koch, McCoy, Morgan, Pauli and Stenzler (leader: Blanks)
3) Accountability
Members: Drs. Gutierrez, Kevorkian, Mikula, and Plummer (leader: Plummer)
4) Licensure Requirements
Members: Drs. Brown, Decker, Kent, and Sinnott (leader: Brown)
5) Model License Act
Members: Drs. Campanale, Kent, Koch, and Schubel (leader: Koch)
6) Mutual Support
Members: Dr. Bellows, George, Rice, and Schubel, (leader: George)
Some participants were unable to attend the final stages of the meeting and did not join the task forces. They are encouraged to become involved in at least one group and to contact that group's leader.
Note: one-page summaries of the outcomes, plans and timelines were submitted by four of the task forces but are not included here since most consisted simply of rough notes and more time is needed by the members to discuss and formulate these points. |